Compare & Contrast: Homelessness is More Appealing

Many of us volition never be dispossessed(prenominal), and non e unfeignedly adept understands the benefit of having a married woman, but by and by reading the hears, Homeless (Quindlen, A. n. d. ) and I ask a Wife (Brady, J. 1971), one prat gain a better savvy of some(prenominal)(prenominal). I am a married woman. Therefore, I passel certainly connect with the tellers narrative of I destiny a Wife. This is a narrative shew, in which the bank clerk devises on why she alike would like to contain a wife after a visit with a recently divorced male friend, who is expression for a new wife.The vote counter gives a dip of duties and activities she will and will non do if she had a wife, and she discharge run across the benefits a wife could afford her with less responsibilities and more(prenominal)(prenominal) time for school or friends. My other bear witness of choice is sort of different in theme, but it is withal relatable. Anne Quindlens essay, Homeless (n. d. ) is a abruptly descriptive essay with the vote counter retelling of an report when she met a woman, who she believes is stateless, at the bus closing. It is during the assure that the bank clerk forges on homeless sight in general, the homeless individual and around herself.Both of these essays be intimately written, but, I experience that Homeless (Quindlen, A. n. d. ), is a more harmonic essay than I hope a Wife (Brady, J. 1971), as it appropriates the re fascinateer to plump more charterd in the descriptions and reflect on the exposit of the story. Whenever I divulgeset of all start reading any pillowcase of literature, the first thing I label is the writing name of the root and the bear d profess of catch (POV) of the narrator. Key elements of the writing style for me are POV, trace, pace, and conciseness when possible. The point of view is important to the lecturer as it may not be theirs.This should cause the lector to pay closer pre caution to particulars. How a lot credibility does the narrator offer. The tone of a story is set at the truly beginning. The tone along with a levelheaded hook should grab the readers attention so they want to go by reading. For me, both essays Homeless and I Want a Wife captured my interest with the really first sentence. When the opening sentence of an essay starts with I belong to that classification of concourse kn admit as wives, (I Want a Wife) that certainly can catch the attention of another wife. This opening drew me in because I wanted to know what she meant by this statement.The tone is set wives are in a class of their own, and the narrator has my attention. Now, she will tell us from her point of view why she wants a wife, too. Homeless, is similar in that it in like manner grabs the reader just by introducing a character, location, and time of year in its brief opening sentence. However, I do think that this opening is more openhearted than I Want a Wife. The detail the narrator gives the reader create a sort out mental image of the scene. In addition, the second sentence reveals just affluent to keep the reader interested in what the narrator has to say, I was doing a story on homeless people, (Homeless, para 1).Again, the tone is set it is January at the bus terminal where the narrator, who is doing research on homeless people, meets such(prenominal) a person, Ann. It is also in the first sentence we know it is the narrators story as she describes her experience and conference with Ann. With the narrator sharing her experience and converse with the reader, she has getd them into her story making it more personal. some other similarity between these two essays is the authors use of catch spoken communication for the material, the audience, and the year of publication.I Want a Wife, written in 1971, was a period when the libber movement was active. Women were looking for equality in the work place but also at home. The essay, published in the pickup Ms. , makes me believe the writers pass recognize target audience is that of other wives, in store(predicate) wives, and anyone else who reads Ms. Magazine. Her simple statements, or as I like to call it, her laundry tip as to why it would be massive if she had a wife, are easy to equal to as many of us behave these duties on a daily basis. In Homeless, the setting of the story, January at the bus terminal, leaves it to the readers imagination of the year.The payoff of the essay, homeless people, is timeless as it is has been an ongoing trouble for decades. The language the narrator uses is simplistic unless descriptively concise. It still gives enough detail to help you feel connected to what the narrator is saying. You can feel her emotions through her words. I believe her target audience is everyone. As the narrator states, We walk around it when it is manufacture on the sidewalk or posing in the bus terminalthe difficulty, that is. She is per forming upon the readers emotions by pointing out how many people ignore the problem even when we come demo to face with it at times.I feel this essay can transcend time because of the specific descriptive words the author uses to engage the reader. In addition, until homelessness becomes obsolete, this will be an issue connection will keep open to discuss. I do not believe the same can be said about I Want a Wife. Reading this essay now seems irrelevant in 2013, whereas in 1971, this was a reality for some wives. piece I found both essays well written and share similar get wind elements in writing style and take over language, I found Homeless, to be a more challengeing read.The topic of the essay, homeless people, is a current issue we continue to face in society today, which makes it more relatable to the reader. It causes the reader to use their imagination, critical opinion skills, and reflect on a slightly sensitive topic. I think the topic of I want a Wife, is appro priate for the period it was written, but it does not in reality apply to todays families. The grammatical construction of the family has changed dramatically in the last forty years. No longer is it the norm for the wife to be the one to shoulder all of the family responsibility.In more householdholds than not, it is now a shared out responsibility. Even though Judy Bradys essay can cause the reader to reflect on how life was for wives during that era, it does not really fit our society today. Reading the essay now, it seems more of a farce than the womens liberationist statement it was of 1971. Another appealing looking of Homeless is the description and detail the narrator uses. She creates visual images with her words that capture and engage the reader. Some of the visual images that were memorable to me are the description of Ann, her photo, and the narrators own ferocity for the love of her own home.The narrators description of the grime that creases Anns bags and raincoa t give you a soak up picture of her appearance. The description of the yellow house in the photo, with the aluminum siding and a chain-link fence, a narrow driveway tally up to a one-car garage, and a place of backyard, (Homeless para 2) gives the reader a trenchant image of the house. It is through these descriptions that I have a better understanding of both the characters and their perspective of homeless.I Want a Wife, dapple well written and entertaining, it did not appeal to my emotional side like Homeless. I felt as though the narrator was giving us her laundry list and doing so without any emotion. She does not invite the reader into the story, as the structure is very chaotic and unorganized. In addition, she often repeats herself throughout the essay, which makes it difficult to get a clear picture of any one belief as she moves quickly from one idea to the next. Each essay shares similar key elements of writing style and appropriate language.They both capture their targeted audience with creative introductions that rupture the reader into the story. The authors use of simple statements and descriptions allow for easy reading and understanding of the topic, however I believe that Homeless was more successful in engaging the readers senses. Anna Quindlen used specific descriptions and details to bring the reader into her story. Her topic is one that everyone understands as it is, still an issue society faces today. She appeals to our emotions and causes the reader to reflect on their own life and those affected by it.